<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Mauisun's LivingRoom]]></title>
		<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb</link>
		<description>This is a discussion forum powered by vBulletin. To find out about vBulletin, go to http://www.vbulletin.com/ .</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 20:21:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Zipping Through Their Training</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111085&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[While they aren't going faster than a  
speeding bullet, zipping through the  
sky on their stomachs like Superman  
has become a daily ritual for those  
training to become guides at the Silver  
Valley's first ziplining course, Silver  
Streak Zipline Tours.  
 
The course, which is owned by...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>While they aren't going faster than a <br />
speeding bullet, zipping through the <br />
sky on their stomachs like Superman <br />
has become a daily ritual for those <br />
training to become guides at the Silver <br />
Valley's first ziplining course, Silver <br />
Streak Zipline Tours. <br />
<br />
The course, which is owned by David <br />
DeRoos, is aiming to open at the <br />
beginning of June, but the staff has <br />
been training on the ziplines for three <br />
weeks now. Dave and Love Burland <br />
of Geronimo Construction, the <br />
company behind the construction <br />
of the zipline course, are conducting <br />
the training of the future basic and <br />
lead guides at Silver Streak Zipline <br />
Tours.<br />
<br />
more > <a href="http://www.shoshonenewspress.com/news/article_89895380-9ea6-11e1-8b12-0019bb2963f4.html" target="_blank">http://www.shoshonenewspress.com/new...9bb2963f4.html</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
robotic regards,<br />
<br />
thox</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=93">Domestic U.S. News</category>
			<dc:creator>Thox</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111085</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No butts about it!?!</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111077&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Nearly 40% of the time a New York City dispatcher answers a 911 call, there’s no actual emergency. Yep, in 2010, two-fifths of all calls to New York’s 911 system were accidental “butt dials,” the New York Daily News reports. A total of 10.4 million 911 calls were received that year, a new report...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Nearly 40% of the time a New York City dispatcher answers a 911 call, there’s no actual emergency. Yep, in 2010, two-fifths of all calls to New York’s 911 system were accidental “butt dials,” the New York Daily News reports. A total of 10.4 million 911 calls were received that year, a new report found, and police were sent to about 3.5 million emergencies as a result. That’s notable since the number of butt dials was higher than that, at almost 4 million—or an average of 10,700 per day.:eek:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=93">Domestic U.S. News</category>
			<dc:creator>xtech</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fukushima</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111070&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 20:58:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This looks quite gloomy, indeed.  I might need to change my opinion of 2012 being the end of the world - at least as we know it. 
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/035789_Fukushima_Cesium-137_Plume-Gate.html 
 
 
---Quote--- 
Fukushima reactor No. 4 vulnerable to catastrophic collapse; could unleash 85...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This looks quite gloomy, indeed.  I might need to change my opinion of 2012 being the end of the world - at least as we know it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/035789_Fukushima_Cesium-137_Plume-Gate.html" target="_blank">http://www.naturalnews.com/035789_Fu...lume-Gate.html</a><br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				Fukushima reactor No. 4 vulnerable to catastrophic collapse; could unleash 85 times Cesium-137 radiation of Chernobyl; human civilization on the brink<br />
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor <br />
<br />
(NaturalNews) The news you are about to read puts everything else in the category of "insignificant" by comparison. Concerned about the 2012 U.S. presidential election? Worried about GMOs? Fluoride? Vaccines? Secret prisons? None of that even matters if we don't solve the problem of Fukushima reactor No. 4, which is on the verge of a catastrophic failure that could unleash enough radiation to end human civilization on our planet. (See the numbers below.)<br />
<br />
The resulting releasing of radiation would turn North America into a "dead zone" for humans... mutated (and failed) crops, radioactive groundwater, skyrocketing infant mortality, an explosion in cancer and infertility... this is what could be unleashed at any moment from an earthquake in Japan. Such an event could result in the release of 85 times the Cesium-137 released by the Chernobyl catastrophe, say experts (see below). And the Chernobyl catastrophe made its surrounding regions uninhabitable by humans for centuries.<br />
<br />
Yet, astonishingly, the usual suspects of deception are saying absolutely nothing about this problem. The mainstream media (the dying dinosaur media, actually) pretends there's no problem with Fukushima. President Obama says nothing about it. Federal regulators, including the NRC, are all but silent. It's as if they think their silence on the issue somehow makes it go away.<br />
<br />
Perhaps these professional liars in the media and government have become so used to idea that they can simply spin their own reality (and get the public suckers to believe almost anything) that they now believe they can ignore the laws of physics. That's why they have refused to cover the low-level radiation plume that continues to be emitted from Fukushima.<br />
<br />
<br />
The fate of the world now rests on reactor No. 4<br />
"It is no exaggeration to say that the fate of Japan and the whole world depends on No.4 reactor." - Mitsuhei Murata, Former Japanese Ambassador to Switzerland and Senegal, Executive Director, the Japan Society for Global System and Ethics<br />
<br />
Mr. Murata's stunning statement should be front-page news everywhere around the world. Why? Because he's right. If reactor No. 4 suffers even a minor earthquake, it could set off a chain reaction of events that quickly lead to North America becoming uninhabitable by humans for centuries to come. Imagine California, Oregon and Washington states being inundated with radiation -- up to 85 times the radiation release from Chernobyl. We're talking about the end of human life on the scale of continents.<br />
<br />
Here's how this could happen, according to Mr. Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy:<br />
<br />
"The No. 4 pool is about 100 feet above ground, is structurally damaged and is exposed to the open elements. If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident. The infrastructure to safely remove this material was destroyed as it was at the other three reactors. Spent reactor fuel cannot be simply lifted into the air by a crane as if it were routine cargo. In order to prevent severe radiation exposures, fires and possible explosions, it must be transferred at all times in water and heavily shielded structures into dry casks. As this has never been done before, the removal of the spent fuel from the pools at the damaged Fukushima-Dai-Ichi reactors will require a major and time-consuming re-construction effort and will be charting in unknown waters." (<a href="http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/forum/218/nuclear-expert-fukushima-spent-" target="_blank">http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/forum/21...kushima-spent-</a>...)<br />
<br />
Note: He says "10 times" the Cesium-137 of Chernobyl. Others say up to 85 times. Nobody is 100% certain of what would actually occur because this has never happened before. We are in uncharted territory as a civilization, facing a unique and imminent threat to our continued survival. And both governments and the corporations that assured us nuclear power was safe are playing their "cover my ass" games while the world waits in the crosshairs of a nuclear apocalypse.<br />
<br />
<br />
Fukushima Facts<br />
To better understand the severity of this situation, read these facts about Fukushima reactor No. 4 which I have assembled from available news sources:<br />
<br />
• Reactor #4 contains 1,535 spent fuel rods which remain highly radioactive.<br />
<br />
• These fuel rods currently hold the potential to emit 37 million curies of radiation.<br />
<br />
• Those fuel rods are stored in a concrete pool located 100 feet above the ground, inside the structurally compromised reactor building, effectively making the pool open to the air.<br />
<br />
• The pool holding these fuel rods is "structurally damaged."<br />
<br />
• "If an earthquake or other event were to cause this pool to drain this could result in a catastrophic radiological fire involving nearly 10 times the amount of Cs-137 released by the Chernobyl accident." - Mr. Robert Alvarez, former Senior Policy Adviser to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment at the U.S. Department of Energy.<br />
<br />
• "The infrastructure to safely remove this material was destroyed as it was at the other three reactors." - Mr. Alvarez.<br />
<br />
• Just 50 meters from reactor No. 4, a much larger pool of spent fuel rods contains 6,375 fuel rods, all of which remain highly radioactive.<br />
<br />
• All these fuel rods are, astonishingly, exposed to the open air. They are not held inside any containment vessel.<br />
<br />
• The total number of spent fuel rods across all six reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi site is 11,421.<br />
<br />
• If reactor No. 4 suffers a structural failure, the release of radiation from the 1,535 spent fuel rods would make it virtually impossible for work to continue on the site, potentially resulting in an inability to halt a massive radiation release from all the other rods.<br />
<br />
• In all, the 11,421 fuel rods held at the Fukushima Daiichi facility contain roughly 336 million curies of "long-lived radioactivity." Roughly 134 million curies of that is Cesium-137.<br />
<br />
• "Reactors that have been operating for decades, such as those at the Fukushima-Dai-Ichi site have generated some of the largest concentrations of radioactivity on the planet." - Mr. Robert Alvarez, U.S. Dept. of Energy<br />
<br />
• This amount of Cesium-137 radioactivity held in the full collection of fuel rods at Fukushima is 85 times the amount released at Chernobyl.<br />
<br />
• The release of this amount of Cesium-137 would "destroy the world environment and our civilization. This is an issue of human survival." (<a href="http://akiomatsumura.com/2012/04/682.html" target="_blank">http://akiomatsumura.com/2012/04/682.html</a>)<br />
<br />
• The mainstream media operates in a total blackout of this news, refusing to even acknowledge the existence of this immediate threat to human civilization.<br />
<br />
• The mainstream media is, in large part, owned by General Electric, the very company that designed the Fukushima reactors in the first place. It is clear that GE is diligently running a total media blackout on this news in order to cover its own ass and prevent people from asking questions about the faulty engineering and nuclear facility site selection that led to this catastrophe.<br />
<br />
<br />
18,000 dead so far and hundreds of millions at risk: The media cover-up<br />
"The executive branch and multiple federal agencies, agencies tasked with keeping the American public safe, did their best to hide and to cover-up information about a deadly radioactive plume and ensuing fallout that was headed for the West Coast of the United States from Japan," says Alexander Higgins. (<a href="http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/03/01/plumegate-media-silent-fe" target="_blank">http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/201...edia-silent-fe</a>...) (please go to page for links)<br />
<br />
<br />
He goes on to state "The evidence obtained in the FOIA request indicates that right from the start, the NRC had a clear idea of the significance of the disaster that was unfolding, but concealed the truth from the American public. The results of the plume and fallout can be measured in the rise of infant mortality rates: cells of unborn and newborn children are dividing at a much higher rate than those of a mature adult, thus the amount of damage is greatly increased and hence more detectable. Conservative estimates place the number of stillborn following the Fukushima accident at over 18,000."<br />
<br />
See the FOIA documents here:<br />
<a href="http://www.houseoffoust.com/NRC/ML11269A172.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.houseoffoust.com/NRC/ML11269A172.pdf</a><br />
<br />
and here:<br />
<a href="http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf" target="_blank">http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12052A106.pdf</a><br />
<br />
The conspiracy cover-up of the radioactive plumes still being emitted from Fukushima is now being called "Plume-Gate." This issue needs to be front and center on all our radar screens. There may quite literally be nothing more important for the survival of the human race than dealing with this runaway issue of Fukushima radiation in the immediate term, and the larger issue of the scientific fraud of nuclear power "safety" thereafter.<br />
<br />
As Higgins explains, "It is this author's opinion that any media source not shouting about Plume-Gate as loud as they can are likely controlled by the powers-that-be." He's got a point. This should be our No. 1 issue, and NaturalNews is re-shifting priorities right now to help raise the alarm on the impeding Fukushima disaster for the obvious reason that everything else pales in comparison to the importance of dealing with this.<br />
<br />
<br />
Take action now<br />
Although I hate to call for the UN to do anything at all, as it is a criminal globalist organization engaged in widespread sex slave trafficking, child abuse and mass murder, the UN definitely has some pull with governments around the world. The petition linked below calls for the UN to take immediate, decisive action to deal with Fukushima reactor No. 4 before it's too late and we all get "Fuk'ed" beyond repair.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.org/2012/05/01/an-urgent-request-o" target="_blank">http://fukushima.greenaction-japan.o...gent-request-o</a>...<br />
 (please go to page for links)<br />
<br />
This petition calls for two actions:<br />
<br />
1. The United Nations should organize a Nuclear Security Summit to take up the crucial problem of the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 spent nuclear fuel pool.<br />
<br />
2. The United Nations should establish an independent assessment team on Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4 and coordinate international assistance in order to stabilize the unit's spent nuclear fuel and prevent radiological consequences with potentially catastrophic consequences.<br />
<br />
Here at NaturalNews, although we hold the UN in contempt for its globalist actions and crimes against humanity, we nevertheless support this particular petition and the urgent effort for the UN to actually do something positive for a change. In fact, if the UN ignores this issue, that itself would be the greatest crime of all against humanity, for failure to solve this reactor No. 4 situation could mean the end of human civilization as we know it.<br />
<br />
NaturalNews will continue to cover this issue, especially focusing on reactor No. 4. We are reaching out to Higgins and Gunderson to conduct more interviews on this subject. Watch for more coverage here at NaturalNews.com.<br />
<br />
Sources include: (please go to page for links)
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=94">International News</category>
			<dc:creator>Classica</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111070</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CISPA passes in the house</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111056&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>CISPA, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, has just passed the House by a vote of 248 to 168. The vote was largely along partisan lines, with some leaking. 
 
The bill attracted several amendements along the way to passage today, including measures from Rogers concerning the Freedom...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>CISPA, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, has just passed the House by a vote of 248 to 168. The vote was largely along partisan lines, with some leaking.<br />
<br />
The bill attracted several amendements along the way to passage today, including measures from Rogers concerning the Freedom of Information Act, and the Quayle amendment that dictated information collected could only be used in a set number of circumstances.<br />
<br />
However, the bill’s future is murky. It has to get past the Senate, in some form, and then through the desk of the President, who yesterday floated a veto threat of the Act, signaling unhappiness with its potential lack of privacy controls.<br />
<br />
Many have found the bill to be troublesome, given that, in their estimation, its language was too broad to be safe. Also that the government could use the mandates and powers contained therein in ways that would be antithetical to privacy, and even in the cause of cyber security, could be too intrusive. TNW joined in their discontent.<br />
<br />
We will be covering the bill’s next steps extremely closely. For more, check all of TNW’s CISPA coverage.<br />
<br />
–<br />
<br />
For a quick look at the Senate’s version of CISPA, check this article from the EFF. There are two ‘competing’ bills being considered in the Senate that could be reconciled with CISPA. Between the two bills, here’s one o the critical differences, if you want the short version:<br />
<br />
[T]he language varies from bill to bill, but for the most part, the strongest restriction on the countermeasures is that there be a “defensive intent” (language that appears in both the Lieberman and McCain bills). The Lieberman bill mentions “modify[ing] or block[ing] data packets,” while the McCain bill is more vague.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://thenextweb.com/us/2012/04/27/the-house-passes-cispa-with-a-vote-of-248-to-168/" target="_blank">http://thenextweb.com/us/2012/04/27/...of-248-to-168/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=93">Domestic U.S. News</category>
			<dc:creator>Runaway1956</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bees dying off?</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111055&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, the bees aren't "dying off".  We are killing them. 
 
 
Posted: 24 April  2012 
Quietly, globally, billions of bees are dying, threatening our crops and food. But if Bayer stops selling one group of pesticides, we could save bees from extinction. 
 
Four European countries have begun...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Actually, the bees aren't "dying off".  We are killing them.<br />
<br />
<br />
Posted: 24 April  2012<br />
Quietly, globally, billions of bees are dying, threatening our crops and food. But if Bayer stops selling one group of pesticides, we could save bees from extinction.<br />
<br />
Four European countries have begun banning these poisons, and some bee populations are already recovering. But Bayer, the largest producer of neonicotinoids, has lobbied hard to keep them on the market. Now, massive global pressure from Avaaz and others has forced them to consider the facts, and in 24 hours, Bayer shareholders will vote on a motion that could stop these toxic chemicals. Let’s all act now and shame the shareholders to stop killing bees.<br />
<br />
The pressure is working, and this is our best chance to save the bees. Sign the urgent petition and send this to everyone -- let's reach half a million signers and deliver it directly to shareholders tomorrow in Germany!<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://secure.avaaz.org/en/bayer_save_the_bees/?cl=1762165005&amp;v=13897" target="_blank">https://secure.avaaz.org/en/bayer_sa...165005&amp;v=13897</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=94">International News</category>
			<dc:creator>Runaway1956</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111055</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Citizens United being challenged</title>
			<link>http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111054&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.pdacommunity.org/component/content/article/90-ecr-articles/1526-citizens-united-and-the-19th-amendment 
 
 
When the Supreme Court handed down the Citizens United decision in January 2010, President Obama described it as “devastating to the public interest” and promised that he would...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.pdacommunity.org/component/content/article/90-ecr-articles/1526-citizens-united-and-the-19th-amendment" target="_blank">http://www.pdacommunity.org/componen...19th-amendment</a><br />
<br />
<br />
When the Supreme Court handed down the Citizens United decision in January 2010, President Obama described it as “devastating to the public interest” and promised that he would work to “repair the damage that has been done.” It was supposed to be among his top priorities.<br />
<br />
If working to reverse Citizens United has been one of Obama’s priorities, though, it’s been a well-kept secret. He rarely mentions it, and in February he reversed himself and decided accept funding from a Super PAC that’s raising money for his election campaign. (Citizens United allows Super PACs – or “political action committees” – to raise unlimited cash contributions from individuals, almost always on behalf of a particular candidate or cause.)<br />
<br />
But in truth, the momentum for reversing Citizens United was never going to come from the White House, much less from Congress. Both are too deeply enmeshed in the system to invest much effort in reforming it. The energy to defeat the ruling will come, if it comes from anywhere, from old-fashioned grassroots activism. And on that front, the outlook is more promising than you might guess. There’s good news and bad news, and some more good news.<br />
<br />
The first piece of good news is that Citizens United isn’t a partisan issue: a substantial majority of voters favor imposing limits on the influence of money and lobbyists in American politics. In a poll (PDF) released in January by the firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, 55 percent of respondents said that corporations should not have the constitutional rights accorded to individuals. Eighty percent favored limiting campaign contributions and spending, and 89 percent of independent voters favored “reasonable limits.” Two-thirds of the latter group said that “campaign finance reform is a very important factor in their vote.” The same was true for 69 percent of Democrats and 56 percent of Republicans.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/forumdisplay.php?f=93">Domestic U.S. News</category>
			<dc:creator>Runaway1956</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mauisun.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=111054</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

